Learning to be Curious About Our Emotions
There is a quote, often misattributed to Walt Whitman, urging us to "be curious, not judgmental." Most of us recognize this as a tool for interpersonal harmony—a way to pause before reacting to a difficult colleague or a grieving friend. But the most transformative application of this concept isn’t necessarily outward; it’s inward.
When we experience emotions such as anger, deep sorrow, or even numbness, our instinct is to label them. We tell ourselves, "I shouldn't feel this way," or "This is a bad emotion." This judgment creates a secondary layer of suffering. Instead, curiosity invites us to treat our emotions as data, not directives.
Emotions as Information
Psychological research, such as the work on Affective Realism and Emotional Granularity by Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett, suggests that our brains construct emotions as guesses about what is happening in our bodies and the world. From this perspective, an emotion isn’t "good" or "bad"—it is a signal.
Anger might be a signal that a boundary has been crossed.
Guilt might be an invitation to examine our values.
Deep Sadness is often a testament to the depth of our love.
The Power of being an Emotion Scientist, Rather than an Emotion Judger
Studies on mindful emotion regulation highlight that observing emotions without judgment—a core tenet of curiosity—actually reduces their physiological intensity. When we ask, "Where do I feel this in my body?" or "What is this feeling trying to protect?" we shift from being overwhelmed by the wave to becoming the observer of the tide.
By replacing "Why am I like this?" or “this emotion is bad, I shouldn’t feel it” with "what is this emotion trying to tell me?" we create the space necessary to choose our next step, rather than reacting out of habit.
Next time a difficult emotion arrives, try to greet it like a messenger. You don't have to like the message, but being curious about its contents might help you discern what you need in the moment.
